recursion reached
recursion reached recursion reached 🌐

@bea @iliana there's probably stuff in the cgweb meeting transcripts
i know puck talked about this too

recursion reached
bunch o text about ap+as2 groups recursion reachedrecursion reachedrecursion reached

@er1n @bea  @iliana I wrote a bunch of text then Kroeg decided to reload (really need to do a DOM-diff render). anyways, AS2 has a definition for `Group`, which is a type of actor. You could make it so if you send an object to the Group *and* send it to its followers, the Group will relay the objects towards its inbox towards every follower of that group. and people that can send objects to the group could e.g. curate it, by way of normal c2s activities. idk, I think a bunch of code still assumes actor == the outbox it is from, we need to figure that out somehow.

/ /
bunch o text about ap+as2 groups recursion reachedrecursion reachedrecursion reachedrecursion reached

@puckipedia @er1n @iliana yeah that last bit i think is what @cwebber has some ideas about? can't quite remember... we talked about it before the break

bunch o text about ap+as2 groups recursion reachedrecursion reachedrecursion reachedrecursion reached

@bea @puckipedia @er1n @iliana It turns out we have a SocialCG meeting in half an hour... maybe a good time to talk about this? :)

bunch o text about ap+as2 groups recursion reachedrecursion reachedrecursion reachedrecursion reached

@cwebber @puckipedia @er1n @iliana i can't join, at least not in any capacity that will allow me to talk 😩

bunch o text about ap+as2 groups recursion reachedrecursion reachedrecursion reachedrecursion reached

@bea @puckipedia @er1n @iliana Can you participate on IRC? All meetings are scribed, so IRC-only participation is possible!

bunch o text about ap+as2 groups recursion reachedrecursion reachedrecursion reachedrecursion reached

@cwebber @puckipedia @er1n @iliana ehm yes, physically i can be present in either voice or text but last time i went to join somewhere i was supposed to declare my employer and stuff? which i'm not willing to do. is this different?

bunch o text about ap+as2 groups recursion reachedrecursion reached

@bea I think taht's for the WG? at least for https://www.w3.org/community/SocialCG/ you have to sign a CLA but I don't think it needs to really know your employer, as you sign up as an individual? idk for sure. @cwebber

/ /
Count: 1
bunch o text about ap+as2 groups recursion reachedrecursion reached

@puckipedia @cwebber "I confirm that I have no significant employment relation with any organization. (If incorrect update affiliation first)"

so... my employer has nothing (and i'm sure wants nothing) to do with any of this

can i check this box?

Kroeg pre-alpha - This page has been rendered on the Server